In a chilling 2012 email exchange, UAE diplomat Hind Al-Owais wrote to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein: “I am so excited to see you and introduce you to my sister—she is even prettier than me!!!!!”
After more than a decade buried in secrecy, the U.S. Department of Justice has unsealed hundreds of messages—469 in total—between the prominent Emirati human rights advocate and Epstein from 2011 to 2012. The correspondence reveals casual plans for social meetings, affectionate sign-offs like “Kisses,” and eager discussions about bringing her younger sister into Epstein’s orbit, raising disturbing questions about awareness and intent given his notorious crimes.
What drove a respected diplomat to maintain such frequent, intimate contact with a predator already convicted of sex offenses—and why mention her sister in such glowing, almost promotional terms?
The recent unsealing of documents by the U.S. Department of Justice has brought renewed scrutiny to Jeffrey Epstein’s extensive network of contacts, including a series of 469 emails exchanged between 2011 and 2012 with Hind Al-Owais, a prominent Emirati diplomat and human rights advocate. In one chilling 2012 exchange, Al-Owais wrote to the convicted sex offender: “I am so excited to see you and introduce you to my sister—she is even prettier than me!!!!!” This message, along with others discussing social meetings, affectionate sign-offs like “Kisses,” and arrangements involving her younger sister, has sparked widespread questions about awareness, intent, and judgment.
Al-Owais, who has served as Director of the UAE’s Permanent Committee for Human Rights and previously as a senior adviser at the United Nations, maintained frequent and seemingly personal correspondence with Epstein during a period when his 2008 conviction for procuring a minor for prostitution was public knowledge. The emails, part of broader Epstein-related releases, primarily cover logistical plans for meetings, casual conversations, and occasional career-related advice. Epstein reportedly offered introductions to influential figures that may have aided Al-Owais’s professional trajectory, including her later UN role. However, the references to her sister—described in some reports as potentially minor at the time—stand out as particularly disturbing given Epstein’s documented pattern of exploiting young women and girls.
Several messages from January 2012 detail coordination for encounters. In one, Al-Owais noted the challenges of “getting one girl ready” versus “two girls,” in the context of scheduling time with Epstein. Another exchange confirms an in-person appointment involving both sisters, with Epstein requesting “more time with you two.” While the full context of these phrases remains debated—some interpret them innocently as referring to preparing for social outings—the optics are undeniably troubling. Epstein’s crimes involved grooming, trafficking, and abuse, often facilitated through his connections to powerful individuals who provided access, legitimacy, or cover.
What drove a respected figure in human rights and diplomacy to sustain such intimate contact with a known predator? Several factors may explain it. Epstein cultivated an image as a brilliant financier and philanthropist with elite connections, attracting ambitious professionals seeking networking opportunities. In the early 2010s, his legal troubles were downplayed in certain circles; he had served minimal jail time and maintained influential friendships. Al-Owais’s emails suggest she viewed him as a mentor or connector rather than a threat, possibly unaware of—or choosing to ignore—the full extent of his offenses.
The revelations have triggered backlash, including the apparent removal of Al-Owais’s online profiles from UAE government sites and her deactivation of social media accounts. No criminal charges have been filed against her, and the documents do not accuse her of direct involvement in Epstein’s crimes. Yet the correspondence raises broader issues about accountability, the enabling role of high-society networks, and how individuals in positions of influence sometimes prioritize access over ethical caution.
In an era of greater transparency around Epstein’s enablers, this case underscores a persistent question: how much did people know, and why did they continue engaging? The answers remain unsettling, highlighting the predator’s ability to embed himself in global elite circles long after his conviction.
Leave a Reply