Epstein Didn’t Commit Suicide? Barry Levine Points Out 3 Major Red Flags: No Blood, Wrong Person Did Autopsy, Wrong Noose! l

The death of Jeffrey Epstein continues to spark controversy, and journalist Barry Levine has outlined three key points he believes raise serious questions about the official ruling of suicide.

First, Levine highlights claims about the absence of blood on the ligature used in Epstein’s death. He suggests this detail is unusual and worth closer examination. However, forensic experts caution that individual physical findings can vary widely depending on circumstances, and such details alone are not enough to determine cause of death.

Second, Levine points to the role of the Chief Medical Examiner. He argues that the top official did not personally perform the autopsy, which he considers problematic given the high-profile nature of the case. In practice, though, it is standard for senior medical examiners to supervise rather than directly conduct every autopsy, relying on trained forensic pathologists within their office.

Third, Levine raises concerns about whether the correct ligature was tested for DNA, suggesting the possibility of a mix-up. This claim has drawn attention online, but there has been no confirmed evidence from official investigations indicating that the wrong item was analyzed. Proper chain-of-custody procedures are designed to prevent exactly this type of error.

Epstein was found dead in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial, and authorities ruled his death a suicide following an official investigation. Still, the case has remained controversial due to documented failures at the facility, including lapses in monitoring and malfunctioning cameras. These issues have contributed significantly to ongoing public skepticism.

While Levine’s points have fueled renewed debate, it’s important to distinguish between verified findings and interpretations or hypotheses. Disagreements among experts and commentators are not uncommon in complex cases, especially when public trust has already been shaken.

Years later, the Epstein case continues to sit at the intersection of fact, speculation, and public curiosity. Levine’s “three red flags” add to a long list of questions people continue to ask—but without new, confirmed evidence, they remain part of an ongoing discussion rather than definitive proof of an alternative conclusion.